Hello @curiouskitty thank you for taking the time taking a look at Operations. To reply to your query:
The verge of collapse we see maximum is not velocity or sync believe, it is “bookmarks do not fit how I feel.” Folks organise bookmarks via matter (“Information”, “Gear”, “Articles”) however paintings via venture (“Consumer X redesign”, “aspect venture Y”). The mismatch manner you in the end forestall opening the bookmark menu, as a result of what you want is rarely smartly there. Sync believe comes up too, Operations is local-first for that specific reason why, nevertheless it has a tendency to be downstream of the organisation drawback.
That is why we constructed round venture playing cards as an alternative of folders. Each and every card is a venture with its personal hyperlinks, notes, todos. Whilst you take a seat all the way down to paintings on Mission X, the whole thing for Mission X is one click on away, as an alternative of buried below a generic “Gear” folder shared with the whole thing else you’ve gotten ever stored.
At the transfer second in particular:
– Import: we pull from Chrome bookmarks immediately: one-click all the way through onboarding, no guide re-saving. The fair follow-up: most of the people import the whole thing after which realise 80% in their library is useless weight. So the bookmark library is constructed round pruning as you pass, now not “import as soon as and executed.”
– Setup: initiatives are constructed manually: there is no present “venture” construction emigrate from, you might be defining the way you if truth be told paintings. That guide second is intentional.
– Graveyard relapse: venture playing cards have herbal lifespans (venture ends → archive the cardboard). Bookmarks don’t have any scope, they gather eternally. With playing cards, the unit of organisation suits the unit of labor, which appears to be what helps to keep issues from rotting.
What made you ask? In the course of a transfer at the moment, or comparing one?
