Out of doors of Samsung, it’s no longer continuously that two equivalent flagship telephones release with totally other silicon inside of, however with the To find X9 Professional and X9 Extremely, we have now a unprecedented alternative for an enchanting benchmark comparability. With the Extremely powered by way of Qualcomm’s newest Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and the opposite by way of MediaTek’s Dimensity 9500, that is about as shut as we get to a like-for-like chipset showdown.
As a result of each units proportion equivalent specifications, cooling approaches, and instrument optimizations, this comparability strips away lots of the same old variables and places the highlight squarely at the silicon. That provides us a unprecedented probability to peer how Qualcomm and MediaTek’s top-tier 2026 processors actually stack up when the entirety else is held (most commonly) equivalent.
Two telephones, similar emblem, other chips; a novel benchmarking alternative.
It’s value noting that the Professional has a display solution of one,272×2,772, in comparison to 1,440×3,168 for the Extremely. Then again, 3DMark’s graphics checks we’ll be the usage of render at a hard and fast solution (generally 2560×1440) and easily scale to suit, so the other shows gained’t have an effect on efficiency. I even have the 16GB RAM within the X9 Professional, however simply 12GB within the Extremely. Once more, the benchmarks we’re operating aren’t going to come back with regards to maxing this out, so it gained’t affect the effects right here.
A very powerful issue this is that we’ve got two telephones that are meant to use very equivalent, if no longer similar, efficiency and battery optimizations, but they run two other chips. So let’s dive in to peer what our same old benchmarks have to mention.
Snapdragon vs Dimensit:y 2026 version
Beginning with CPU checks by way of Geekbench 6, we will see that Qualcomm’s customized Oryon CPU cores proceed to guide the Arm C1-Extremely and C1-Professional. This offers the To find X9 Extremely a 13.5% single-core acquire over its older sibling, a marginal win for uncommon eventualities that require slightly further grunt, comparable to recreation emulation. Multi-core is identical, with a 13.1% win for the Snapdragon, which may translate into on the subject of tangible positive aspects when the telephone is operating onerous on more than one or multi-threaded duties.
This receive advantages interprets over to PC Mark’s Paintings 3.0 duties, which take a look at efficiency throughout simulated video enhancing, report compression, and different commonplace duties. As soon as once more, the Snapdragon comes out 14.8% forward right here, additionally proving that extra RAM does no longer translate into extra efficiency in those work-related benchmarks.
The effects are rather grew to become on their head once we transfer to graphics. Arm’s G1-Extremely GPU has made cast positive aspects this yr and in fact now outperforms Qualcomm’s Adreno 840 within the single-run 3DMark checks I ran. MediaTek’s chip rankings a 5.9% win within the difficult Wild Lifestyles Excessive take a look at and fingers in a extra considerable 13.3% win within the ray-tracing-based Sun Bay take a look at. That latter end result issues to a good lead for Arm, despite the fact that ray tracing stays a distinct segment in cell video games. In maximum Android video games, efficiency could be very, very shut between those two chips.
Sadly, the To find X9 Professional doesn’t maintain this efficiency lead for terribly lengthy. It best takes a few runs/mins for the Extremely to take the lead, and it holds a cheap merit for approximately part of the strain checks. In the second one part, each telephones are throttling somewhat onerous, with effects leaping up and down as efficiency is scale back so they can cool off. The behavour is beautiful equivalent on each fashions, despite the fact that the Extremely slightly extra erratic.
You are going to be aware, then again, that the To find X9 Professional runs considerably cooler, holding its temperatures under 40°C (104°F), whilst the Extremely nearly hits 49°C (120°F) ahead of throttling actually hits onerous. This ends up in a miles warmer handset with the Extremely. For the reason that the 2 finally end up with very equivalent efficiency ranges by way of the top of the strain checks, I’d argue the MediaTek chip is doing a greater task on stability, and would undoubtedly be extra comfy to carry all the way through the ones lengthy gaming periods.
In case you’re questioning, the OPPO To find X9 Extremely’s Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 implementation sits proper in the midst of the pack amongst different 2026 flagships that use the similar chip.
Whilst it’s a couple of share issues in the back of the overclocked Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy within the Samsung Galaxy S26 Extremely, it marginally outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Extremely and the OnePlus 15. According to those effects, MediaTek’s flagship chip is nearer to Qualcomm’s higher-clocked fashion in graphics or even beats it in ray tracing efficiency. That’s no doubt excellent information for avid gamers searching for extra selection in {hardware}.
Is Snapdragon nonetheless the quickest chip? It’s sophisticated

Robert Triggs / Android Authority
In the end, this head-to-head highlights simply how aggressive the flagship chipset area has grow to be in 2026. Qualcomm nonetheless holds a measurable edge in CPU efficiency, however MediaTek has closed the distance considerably whilst pushing forward in spaces like GPU potency and thermals.
For many customers, those variations might be onerous to note in daily use, and that’s possibly the most important takeaway: each chips ship extra efficiency than trendy smartphones realistically want. As an alternative of a transparent winner, what we’re seeing is a shift towards parity — and that’s nice information for shoppers. Whether or not you go for the Snapdragon-powered Extremely or the Dimensity-equipped Professional, you’re getting a top-tier enjoy with only a few compromises both method.
Arm’s G1-Extremely GPU has closed the distance on Adreno after which some.
Nonetheless, on the efficiency extremes, Qualcomm’s customized Oryon CPU cores proceed to carry a bonus over Arm’s newest in-house cores. This stays a differentiator in bridging the distance between cell and computer efficiency. Then again, with only a few CPU-bound smartphone duties, it’s no longer totally transparent how massive this lead is, particularly as AI duties are increasingly more offloaded to NPU, GPU, or even AI-accelerator elements like Arm’s SME2 within the Dimensity 9500.
In my view, I believe the graphics entrance is a extra fascinating battleground in lately’s marketplace. No longer as a result of cell video games call for larger body charges; each chipsets are overkill for the most well liked Android titles, even with 120fps and graphics cranked up. However fairly, it’s about turning in prime body charges and graphical constancy with cheap energy intake and comfy temperatures for hand-held use. Whilst those two chips appear quite flippantly matched in efficiency, MediaTek’s use of the Arm G1 Extremely seems to present it a bonus in ray tracing and general temperatures.
Whilst the effects are too with regards to name for an outright winner in accordance with those benchmarks, I can say that the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 isn’t the one top class possibility on the town. You’re not at all lacking out on a lot when you picked the To find X9 Professional over the Extremely, no less than no longer within the chipset division.
Don’t wish to pass over the most productive from Android Authority?


Thanks for being a part of our group. Learn our Remark Coverage ahead of posting.



