@raghavb11 Raghav — the “not more faux inexperienced charts” line is doing a large number of quiet paintings on your
pitch and I do not believe you might be promoting it exhausting sufficient. That is the precise moat.
Somebody can scrape dedicate counts; filtering coauthored-vanity commits, force-pushed
inexperienced squares, and bot-generated PRs is the section that is essentially exhausting to breed
with out seeing what GitHired sees. In case you have a writeup of the way you locate that,
pin it — it is the evidence that you are not “every other GitHub stats wrapper.”
Two items of comments as any person gazing the demo float:
1. The SOURCE → ANALYZE → ENGAGE tale is blank, however ENGAGE is the place these types of
merchandise quietly die. You’ll rank 10K cracked devs completely and nonetheless lose as a result of
the outreach message reads like each different recruiter DM. Best 1% engineers get 30+
of the ones every week and clear out them at the first sentence. Price occupied with whether or not
you’ll send a “display this dev a one-line, project-specific reason why this position would
be fascinating to them, generated from their precise repos” characteristic. That is the bit
that turns 10K chilly profiles into precise replies.
2. The $10K/rent Performed-For-You fashion is an effective way to bootstrap income with out a
gross sales cycle, nevertheless it places you in direct festival with technical recruiting
companies who’ve decade-long relationships with hiring managers. The Self-Serve
$250/seat is the place the venture-scale result lives. I might be gazing carefully whether or not
your DFY income begins cannibalizing Self-Serve adoption or feeding it.
Now the founder-to-founder bit, because you requested us to rip it aside and also you mentioned
“first seek is loose”:
I am operating MentionFox (mentionfox.com) — a solo construct, additionally transport speedy, additionally
on PH in the end. We do for distribution what you do for hiring: floor actual
sign, clear out the faux stuff. Concretely: throughout X, Reddit, HN, Substack, Discord,
information, and many others., we catch the moments the place a founder posts “we are hiring engineers and
resumes are needless” — precisely the conversations the place GitHired belongs within the
answer — and we kill the noise (low-rep accounts, drive-by lawsuits, off-topic
threads). Similar proof-of-work good judgment you follow to commits, implemented to mentions.
The rationale I am bringing this up in particular for you: hiring-tools is among the
toughest classes to get distribution in for the reason that customer (founder/CTO) does not
hand around in r/recruiting — they hand around in r/startups, /r/ExperiencedDevs, X
threads from a16z companions, and Substack posts about scaling groups. Generic listening
instruments (Brandwatch et al) leave out the ones as a result of they are constructed for emblem tracking, no longer
buyer-intent sign. Glad to arrange a loose week of sign scanning on “the best way to rent
engineers / evidence of labor / resume screening / 100x engineer” kind conversations
throughout your actual distribution channels and ship you the leads it surfaces — no
catch, simply curious whether or not the matching high quality holds up for a SaaS like yours.
DM @thefoxsaul on X or answer right here and I’m going to set it up.
Both means: pin the fake-commits technique someplace outstanding. That is the demo
that makes the remainder of the pitch land.
— Saul
